Causal Assumptions

Assumptions

The followings are causal assumptions (those not explained inline will be explained below):

Assumptions can be about observed outcome , observed treatment , and covariates .

Stable Unit Treatment Value Assumptions (SUTVA)

No interference: units of interest do not interfere with each other. In most settings units are people. Situations that these are violated:

One version of treatment

SUTVA allows us to write potential outcome for the ith person in terms of only that person’s treatment. This simplifies the problem.

Ignorability

This is (2). I will elaborate it more intuitively here. They can be ages, gender, places living in, as long as they affect both the treatment and outcomes. And this assumptions is saying: Among people with the same values of , we can think of treatment are randomly are assigned. The following example helps:

Figure 1. Exmaple of Ignorability

And we need to figure it out what we need to collect in order to make that assumption satisfied.

Standardization

Standardization is a way of dealing with confounders. We use the law of total expectation to marginalize out the covariates: If we want marginal causal effect, we can average over all , The crucial caveat is that our $P(\mathbf X=\mathbf x^{(i)})=\frac{I(X=x^{(i)})}{N}$ is approximated by the sample. But even when $\mathbf X$ is a scalar $X$, if it’s continuous, we won’t have all of its values and it’s possible there’s some values we don’t have. This become more severe if $\mathbf X$ is vector. We won’t have a good estimate for $P$. We use many techniques such as matching to deal with this problem.

Causal Assumptions - Ruizhen Mai